01Four reasons to pick something else
1. You need Android rank deeper than the top 30
Google Play exposes no official search endpoint. Storelift reads the public surfaces and prints the depth on screen: up to 200 on iOS, roughly the top 30 on Android. If your app sits at 60 on Play and you need to watch it move, no amount of our reporting will show you that row — and a tool that claims a precise Android rank at 60 is estimating, whether or not it says so.
2. You need market intelligence, not your own rank
Competitor download estimates, revenue estimates, category-level market sizing — Storelift does none of it, by design. It measures where your app ranks and who is above you. If the question is "how big is this market and who is winning it", that is Sensor Tower or Appfigures territory, and the price difference reflects a genuinely different product.
3. Reviews are a workflow for you, not a signal
Storelift shows store reviews with star distribution and a per-version breakdown, because version-level rating movement explains rank movement. What it does not do is reply to reviews, assign them, or track response SLAs. If a support team lives inside review management all day, AppFollow is built for exactly that and we are not competing for it.
4. You manage Apple Search Ads
There is no campaign management in Storelift — no bids, no budgets, no keyword sync to Apple Ads. Mobile Action's campaign manager is free and does that job.
02Which alternative for which need
| What you actually need | Where to look | What it costs you |
|---|---|---|
| Android rank below the top 30 | No tool reads it from an official endpoint — every number there is an estimate | Accuracy you cannot verify |
| Competitor downloads and revenue | Sensor Tower, Appfigures | Sales-call pricing, or $149.99/mo before rank tracking |
| Review replies and team workflow | AppFollow | Review automation starts at Essential, $179/mo |
| Apple Search Ads management | Mobile Action | Free campaign manager; rank tracking from $69/mo |
| Most keywords per dollar | Sonar | $19/mo ($15.75 billed yearly), no free tier |
| Someone to do the ASO for you | Gummicube and other agencies | Agency retainer, not a subscription |
Two of those rows are not us losing a feature race — they are different products that happen to share a shelf. Market intelligence and rank tracking answer opposite questions, and buying one expecting the other is the most common expensive mistake in this category.
03The case Storelift is built for
One developer or a small studio, a handful of apps, who wants to know which keywords they rank for, where, and whether a term has real demand — without a sales call and without losing rank tracking the moment they stop paying.
- The free tier tracks rank. One app, 25 keywords per storefront, two countries, 30 days of history, no end date. Most free tiers in this category exclude rank tracking, which is the part people mean by ASO.
- Demand comes from App Store autocomplete, not the Apple Ads popularity score. In a four-day window from 29 September 2025 the count of US keywords above Apple's popularity floor fell from 165,875 to 39,254 — a 77.4% drop. Tools deriving volume from that score lost the column overnight.
- Three kinds of "no rank" stay separate: ranked at N, measured but outside the result set, and measurement failed. A failed measurement leaves a gap in the chart, never a zero.
- 128 storefronts, each with its own keyword list, and every storefront ID verified by measurement rather than copied from a list.
- A public API and an MCP server on Pro and Studio, so an assistant can read the measurements directly.
If that is not the question you are trying to answer, one of the rows in the table above will serve you better — and the comparison pages linked below go tool by tool with prices read from each vendor's own page.
Frequently asked
Why would a vendor publish its own weaknesses?
Because the alternative is worse. Someone searching "Storelift alternatives" has already decided to look elsewhere; a page that answers with marketing copy loses them and teaches them nothing. A page that names the four cases where another tool genuinely wins is useful even when the answer is "go use AppFollow" — and it is the only version that stays true a year from now.
What is the closest alternative to Storelift on price and scope?
Sonar. It is the nearest competitor on both — $19/mo against Storelift Pro at $20/mo — and it wins on keywords per dollar. Storelift's differences are the permanent free tier that includes rank tracking, 128 storefronts, and the AI-visibility measurement. The per-tool page linked below sets the limits side by side.
Is there an alternative with deeper Android rank data?
Not from an official source. Google Play publishes no search endpoint, so every Android rank figure in every tool — ours included — is read from public surfaces. The honest difference between tools is whether they tell you where that depth ends. Storelift prints it on screen at roughly the top 30.
Can I export and leave?
Yes — PDF, Excel and CSV export and the public API are on both paid tiers. Measurement history belongs to the account that paid for it; nothing here is designed to make leaving expensive.
See this for your own app
Paste your store link, add your keywords. Rank, the apps above you and demand are measured every day.
Start free →